Judge Mark Frankel

Arbitration is a method of conflict resolution when a decision is made by the parties involved in the dispute and is accepted by both sides. As a result, there is no way to challenge or reconsider this verdict. Like mediation, though, arbitration can be non-binding in some cases.

While the legal system is highly structured, arbitration is more informal. Even though there is no judge or jury, the parties are free to agree on a procedure that may include the use of attorneys and a predetermined level of proof. Arbitration can be scheduled at a time that is convenient for both parties, unlike the lengthy and costly process of litigation.

There are two types of awards that an arbitrator can make: reasoned and unreasoned. The arbitrator's decision and the reasoning behind it are detailed in an award that is "reasoned." The victors might then seek to enforce the ruling by collecting any damages owed to them. The term "confirmation" describes this step. Both sides should be specific about the type of reward they need. After all, the level of specificity in a reasoned award is typically far higher than that of an arbitrary one.

The majority of legal disagreements are settled through arbitration. If an arbitration clause is included in the agreement, the parties to a disagreement may submit the matter for resolution through arbitration. In contrast to mediation, a side cannot walk away from an arbitration hearing. Moreover, the parties are free to select their preferred language, venue, and governing law.

Both binding and voluntary arbitration are possible. When parties engage in consensual arbitration, they set parameters within which the arbitral tribunal must make its award decision. When neither party's responsibility is in question but just monetary damages are at stake, an arbitration of this kind might be very helpful. The lower bound of the range is covered by the defendants, while the higher end is covered by the claims. If the reward is within the specified margin of error, it must be accepted.

When a dispute cannot be resolved through negotiation, arbitration can be used as an alternate dispute resolution method. Once both sides have presented their cases, the arbitrator will render a final and legally binding verdict. As opposed to a trial, the rules of evidence are sometimes more lenient in these proceedings. Each participant in the arbitration process pledges to respect the arbitrator's ruling. In contrast, a trial can be requested even in nonbinding arbitration.

The arbitration process is private and easy to use. It's more cost-effective than hiring multiple attorneys, and it gets the job done without breaking the bank. It's a simple process that facilitates negotiation and cooperation. It also gives the parties a chance to settle out of court, saving time and money. Thus, many people see arbitration as a viable option. In arbitration, time is usually of the essence when it comes to reaching a resolution. You may wish to choose fast track arbitration if you're in need of a simple and expedited resolution to your case.

If you have a dispute with someone or something from another country, you may need to resort to international arbitration. Which law applies to a given issue is determined by the nature of the dispute at hand and any applicable contracts between the parties. When both parties to the disagreement and the dispute itself are located in different countries, it is customary to resort to international commercial arbitration.

Go Back

Post a Comment
Created using the new Bravenet Siteblocks builder. (Report Abuse)